Racism Is Good (for some)

By Charles Boz

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

“It (ethnicity and sex of a judge) may and will make a difference in our judging.”

These are only two of the numerous racially-tinged comments made by the apparently race-obsessed and deeply hypocritical and inconsistent United States Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor.

This is the same woman who sided with a black nurse who filed a racial discrimination suit because she worked among a staff of Filipinos at Bellevue Hospital in Manhattan who spoke in their native language around her but denied justice for 19 white firefighters in New Haven, Connecticut by dismissing their racial discrimination complaints that they were stopped from receiving promotions because none of the black applicants passed the test.

Sotomayor gained large applause from radical and separatist Hispanic organizations including the bigot-filled La Raza, Latino Movement USA and Mexicano Movement when she declared at loony leftist Berkeley in 2001 that it was correct and understandable for judges who were non-white to make decisions based on race alone: “……..our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging,” Sotomayor said.

Sotomayor seems to have a race problem and predictably has been embraced by an ever-out-of-control far left spiral of the Democrat Party and its growing number of sicko extremist creeps and hypocritical disciples who are clearly all for racism and double-standards…as long as it benefits them.

The fact Sotomayor was selected by President Obama is about as boringly predictable, racist and hypocritical as it gets. But, so was Obama’s campaign and behavior of an overwhelming majority of corrupt American media openly supporting him and pissing on the people it was supposed to serve with journalistic integrity.

Obama’s selected court nominee really just pushes along a newly installed racist ideology in the White House that blatantly practices bigotry but takes advantage of a nation’s capital currently monopolized by a Democrat Party controlled by African and Hispanic-American bigots and racists along with squeaky-wheel whining “minorities” that gained political and economic prosperity by Obama’s election. For them racism works. It’s good to divide the people. Point out differences and drive policy, law and behavior that benefits non-whites under the guise of double-speak words like diversity, multiculturalism and equality.

Hell, the biggest bigot in the White House is the First Lady herself who could never pass a litmus test for being a well-balanced and unprejudiced individual. Her anti-white bigotry and laughable but remedial “anger” worked with enough people that her stylish victimization–such the rage with liberals–passed her off as a sympathetic figure to them. That’s not to ignore the fact the president has done a good job to date of taking his unhinged and politically dangerous spouse off the speaking circuit so that her racist tendencies don’t show too often.

But it must be questioned why all of this has been permitted anyway. And, for sake of discussion, let’s eliminate one of the obvious and major answers which is that a complicit and criminal media is nothing more than a propaganda arm of the president and his party today so most of the ugliness coming from Obama and his administration, the Democrats, the First Lady and the putrid records of Congressional leaders like Pelosi, Reid and Franks are simply not offered to the people.

Truth is that Sotomayor should not be nominated due to her clear pattern of infusing race into her thinking. Imagine a white judge, male or not, publicly admit his heritage and ethnicity (let’s say Italian or Irish for instance) was a major influence on his decisions so like or it not…tough. But Sotomayor has far more many other things that should be used as legitimate reasons for her denial to the Supreme Court including a open pattern of being an activist judge, literal laziness on the bench where she also has a pattern of taking long, intricate and complicated cases that fill hundreds of pages and skimming on the reading to come up with curiously quick and short-answered judgments that do little to resolve anything at all.

Truth is that if a white spouse of a presidential candidate spoke like Mrs. Obama did during the campaign: invoking racially-toned “us and them” speeches for instance and penned a university paper at an exclusive institution of higher education that painfully offered judgmental views on students of different skin-color, her husband would have been severely hurt by an orgasmic slanted media yelling and screaming.

Truth is that if a white presidential candidate belonged to a church whose pastor repeatedly pissed on America, welcomed an endless string of white supremacists and bigots to insult and stereotype blacks and befriended as well as financially supported a preacher sick with racist and separatist tendencies, he would never, ever have been elected because he would’ve never been nominated in the first place.

President Obama typifies and represents many things. Legitimate racial transparency and neutrality is not one of them. After all, this was a man who marketed himself as a black man instead of a bi-racial man–a man literally half-white–but all black in messaging, image and perception by design. Get ready for more of the same. You have a president in office whose own racist tendencies and those around him, I believe, will eventually seriously hurt him because his decisions, like choosing Sotomayor, are really based in skin-color politics that would never be accepted for a white president.

Instead of the presidential seal following Obama, a picture of the Roman God Janus would be more appropriate as the two-face analogy perfectly fits.

Charles Boz is a frequent columnist for KingNewsMedia.com